Return and correction of purchase requisitions

SiTRACK USE CASE

In standard SAP, error handling is very rigid. If there are inconsistencies (missing data, erroneous allocations, missing attachments, etc.), users usually “reject” the request or “cancel” it and ask for a new one to be created.

This means re-entering data, losing traceability, duplicating work and delaying the purchasing cycle.

If there is any return alternative, there is no automatic notification, information on the required correction or traceability and status of the return, let alone the correction.

SiTRACK – Purchasing Tracking includes a “Request Return” function that allows you to return the request to the requester for corrections, without breaking the release flow or affecting the service times of the purchasing area.

Do you identify with any of these cases?

  • How can I return a requisition to the requester when it has incorrect or incomplete data?
  • Is the release process preserved when making the return or do I have to restart the entire flow?
  • How do you communicate to the user which error to correct and how?
  • How to audit or record returns for internal control purposes?

  • Can I return a request without affecting the SLA of the purchasing team?

Solution

Return and correction functionality of requisitions in SiTRACK

With SiTRACK you have the possibility to:

  1. When making the return, the applicant (and anyone else involved) is notified of what needs to be corrected, with specific comments or directions.
  2. The return respects the release strategies already defined in SAP, i.e. the complete flow is not restarted and control of the process is not lost.
  3. It is applicable on a granular basis (per application or per position).
  4. A status is recorded for both “returned” and “corrected” which may include comments and is visible to all stakeholders.
  5. Allows filtering and reporting of returned requests, to measure how many returns there are, common causes and correction times.

Do you identify with any of these cases?

Common SAP problems solved by SiTRACK

tenders sap excel email

Tenders in SAP without Excel or email: what intelligent sourcing looks like

Enjoy the Audio Version of the Article! When sourcing and early negotiation happen outside SAP, traceability breaks and financial and regulatory risk climbs. Optimizing the procurement cycle requires unifying requests for quotations directly within the transactional core of the system. Below, we will address key concepts you need to know to face this new reality […]

MRP Planning SAP Agribusiness

MRP Planning in SAP for Agribusiness: Stop Planning Your Next Campaign in Excel

Enjoy the Audio Version of the Article! In the agribusiness industry, those of us operating within SAP environments understand that planning is not a theoretical office exercise. It is a critical race against the clock, dictated by uncontrollable crop cycles, highly perishable products, and extremely narrow harvesting windows. In our experience, we have observed that […]

SAP mining best practices

SAP Best Practices for Mining: How to Prevent Stockouts and Protect Operational Continuity

Enjoy the Audio Version of the Article! Organizations often make the mistake of thinking that stockouts are exclusively a failure of planning algorithms. However, in our experience, the root of these shortages usually lies in the lack of alignment between actual field consumption, Master Data integrity, and the agility of procurement processes in geographically distributed […]

Read more about solutions for SAP

P2P Traceability in SAP: How to Follow a Purchasing Process from Requisition to Invoice (Without Shadow Spreadsheets)
Tenders in SAP without Excel or email: what intelligent sourcing looks like
Master data rules in SAP: stop writing them by hand — let your data propose them

Schedule your DEMO

Easy to know.

In 30 – 45 minutes we present you our solutions, online.
So you can see in detail how your processes will be optimized in SAP.

Request a Demo from Innova Apps